Edina Liquor Director Staunchly Opposed to Sunday Liquor Sale
A bill to repeal Minnesota's ban on Sunday liquor sales was reintroduced to the Senate this week.
A large contingent of Minnesotans may support legalizing off-sale liquor sales on Sundays and holidays, but Edina Liquor officials are skeptical it would provide any real benefit to the state.
A bipartisan bill reintroduced to the Senate this week aims to repeal the state's long-standing ban on selling off-sale liquor on Sundays. If passed, it would allow liquor store owners the option of being open for business seven days a week in addition to Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve—after 8 p.m.—and Christmas Day.
Steve Grausam, liquor operations director for the City of Edina's three municipal liquor stores, said he and the majority of his Twin Cities colleagues are staunchly opposed to it.
"The group of people who want to see this happen claim it could increase tax revenue by $10 million," Grausam said. "We simply would not see a big increase in alcohol sales around the metro area. You'd basically see the same amount of sales we do in six days spread out to seven, but then you're also increasing payroll and costs for that extra day. It's not a win-win for most retailers."
The bill was reintroduced by Senators Roger Reinert (D-Duluth) and Jeremy Miller (R-Winona).
Last June, 59 percent of Minnesotans polled by Public Policy Polling said they are in favor of the proposal.
The bill was referred to the Senate Commerce Committee. If the Senate Commerce Committee Chair decides to hear the bill, it will continue to move along in the political process; if not, the bill is likely to die before making it to the floor for discussion.
Grausam said Sunday liquor sales would be a reality by now if so many businesses felt it would be a boon to sales. He noted a select number of larger retailers in the metro area heavily support the change, but said most municipal operations in the metro share his opposition to the legislation.
Allowing Sunday sales also wouldn't necessarily have a positive impact on Minnesotans from a social standpoint, according to Grausam.
"We're not talking about cookies and granola bars," he said. "This is a highly regulated commodity that they're trying to deregulate and make more accessible."
Grausam said he's already been in touch with local legislators this session, as it's "important to provide them with the tools and information necessary to make an informed decision."
And while customers might occasionally grumble about Edina's liquor stores being closed on Sundays—it's typically only younger customers doing the complaining—Grausam said convenience isn't necessarily the best thing for every situation.
"Is it convenient? No," Grausam said. "But should it be convenient? It's alcohol. It's not a staple of our everyday lives, and it really shouldn't be."
Like Edina Patch on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our daily newsletter
Julie C
2:11 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013
When visiting Arizona last year we got a last minute invitation to dinner on Sunday. Stopped and bought a bottle of wine for a hostess gift. In my mind I thought this would not be an option in Minnesota. We must have many visitors to Minnesota that feel the same way. You know it isn't always about "us".
Jay Carroll
11:57 am on Saturday, February 9, 2013
Are we now listening to our Liquor Store Director, who is not a resident of Edina, on what we should or should not be putting in our bodies? This is the same person who received a college scholarship for his family from the Minnesota Municipal Beverage Association and did not turn the money over to the City of Edina Treasury. JCC
Mike B.
12:44 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013
Mr. Grausman (and his "colleagues, for that matter") has no standing or authority to tell consumers when they can purchase alcoholic beverages!
Public employees, such as Mr. Grausman, are hired by the public to serve the taxpaying public, and not to force their personal views on us. By the way,this is something that the Edina City Council should learn as well.
Ray J
7:56 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013
Mr Grausman's concern is the potential emergence of competition as liquor sales are open on more days and ultimately available at more outlets. Trying to limit consumer choice through regulation will always fail in the long run. Does he really expect me to be concerned that providing me choice will impact his cost structure?
Alliea
9:34 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013
Pretty sad to have Mr Grausman given any credibility. What a customer-unfriendly self-serving bureaucratic statement that does not represent residents. I am offended that only the young want liquor on Sunday. We all have surprise get together's. Should our homes have a stockpile on hand? Or should we go to restaurants and bars instead of at home?
This is all about convenience for your customers and residents Mr Gausman, not your costs, profit margins or days off.
Robbie
11:46 pm on Saturday, February 9, 2013
If 59 percent of the voters wish to have liquor sold on Sunday.....I guess it's up to the legislators to decide not Mr Grausam. Almost every state I travel to sells liquor Sunday. They also sell it in grocery stores. Minnesota us behind the times. If I want to buy granola, cookies and liquor on Sunday it's not Mr Grausam's decision....its mine. If he does not want to work Sunday replace him with someone who will accommodate consumers.
Arnie
10:08 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013
Maybe the Liquor Store Director would like the Fire, Police, Emt and other City depts. to take Sunday off some holidays as well. Edina could cut costs and be more profitable. The City is not supposed to make a profit, it supposed to provide services to the residents. France 44 and other liquor stores in Mpls., Wayzata, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park and Bloomington love when Edina closes the stores on the national holidays, they reap huge sales on those days. I would bet than even the Liquor Store Director has driven to those cities on a holiday or two to buy a few Colt 45s. If our Liquor Store Director feels so compassionately about this issue and controlling our personal decisions, he should run for elected office.
Arnie
10:53 am on Sunday, February 10, 2013
Oh by the way, I believe one of Edina's largest companies and employers, Jerry's Enterprises, would love to compete against the Municipal Liquor Store monoply. In a Patch story, they are investing tens of millions of dollars in Woodbury for a new store and an attached liquor store. They own Cub stores in Minnesota that have attached liquor stores Also Target Corporation is in support of allowing grocery stores to sell product. I'm sorry, please tell Director to keep his opinions to himself. If he wants a platform, he can go buy his own private store and keep it closed on Sundays and holidays. The City of Edina can vote and decide to rid itself of the stores, like Shorewood did a few years back. They made millions on the limited licenses they sold and are collecting significant taxes along the way. Jerry's would probably pays millions for the York store next to the Cub they own. Lund's would pay millions more for the 50th street location next to their company headquarters. The Vernon location could sell to the highest bidder, probably Jerry's again. Millions and millions of dollars (retire other City debt) in cash and a future income stream. We don't seem to have a problem giving out more and liquor licenses to restaurants and bars that operate seven days a week and on holidays. I hope he thinks it is alright for me to have a glass of wine at Pittsburgh Blue in Galleria today, otherwise I'd go to Kincaid's in Bloomington. This scenario sounds familiar!
Bob M
4:12 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013
Unless the "liquor director" supplies real statistics of how liquor sales work on Sunday around the country, why should anyone take him seriously? What statistics is he using? No store has sold liquor in Sundays so what is he comparing it to?
Joan H
4:27 pm on Monday, February 11, 2013
I have been following this with interest. Apparently our liquor director who may be active in the Municipal Beverage association has been fighting Sunday sales. Why do you ask is he doing this? An article by Jeff Guntzel in the MInn. Post on 3/24/2011 is illustrative of this. The executive director of the municipal beverage associaton had this to say, "“It’s not about a day off,” says Kaspszak, “and we don’t deny that Sunday sales would probably be good for some of our members in specific locations. It’s that threat of this leading to wine in grocery stores.” Why doesn't our liquor director just tell the truth about this. Heavens forbid we be allowed to run into Lunds and pick up our dinner and check out a bottle of wine at the same time. It might harm his job security....nevermind giving some of us a little convernience in our lives.